plan a few posts - Chameleon

    
      
diff --git a/pythonetc/README.md b/pythonetc/README.md
index dabaac0..ff7d0b4 100644
--- a/pythonetc/README.md
+++ b/pythonetc/README.md
@@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ More:
 1. ./tau.md                     (24 December 2020, 18:00)
 1. ./str-append.md              (29 December 2020, 18:00)
 1. ./new-year.md                (31 December 2020, 18:00)
-1. ./scopes.md
-1. ./nonlocal.md
+1. ./scopes.md                  (25 February 2021, 18:00)
+1. ./nonlocal.md                (2 March 2021, 18:00)
 1. ./str-concat.md
 1. ./bytearray.md
 1. ./join-lists.md
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ Out of order:
 1. ./match.md                   (26 June 2020, 18:00)
 1. ./snippets/to-str-2.md       (30 September 2020, 18:00)
 1. ./class-scope.md             (27 January 2021, 19:00)
-1. ./season25.md
+1. ./season25.md                (24 February 2021, 16:20)
 
 ## TODO
 
diff --git a/pythonetc/season25.md b/pythonetc/season25.md
index 5d7bf23..5715fb6 100644
--- a/pythonetc/season25.md
+++ b/pythonetc/season25.md
@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ It was a long break but tomorrow we start again. We have plenty of ideas for pos
 
 And speaking about bugs, there are few in recent posts that our lovely subscribers have reported:
 
-+ [post #641](https://t.me/pythonetc/641), reported by @recursing. `functools.cache` isn't faster than `functools.lru_cache(maxsize=None)`, it is exactly the same. The confusion comes from [the documentation](https://docs.python.org/3/library/functools.html#functools.cache) which says "this is smaller and faster than lru_cache() WITH A SIZE LIMIT".
++ [post #641](https://t.me/pythonetc/641), reported by @recursing. `functools.cache` isn't faster than `functools.lru_cache(maxsize=None)`, it is exactly the same. The confusion comes from [the documentation](https://docs.python.org/3/library/functools.html#functools.cache) which says "this is smaller and faster than `lru_cache()` WITH A SIZE LIMIT".
 
-+ [post #644](https://t.me/pythonetc/644), reported by @el71Gato. It should be `10**8` instead of `10*8`. We re-run benchmarks with these values, relative numbers are the same, so all conclusions are still correct.
++ [post #644](https://t.me/pythonetc/644), reported by @el71Gato. It should be `10**8` instead of `10*8`. We've re-run benchmarks with these values, relative numbers are the same, so all conclusions are still correct.
 
 Welcome into season 2.5 :)